|
Towards a better measure of risk
by Tim Farrelly | Originally
published in
PortfolioConstruction Journal
| Spring 2004 |
Investors face many
risks, some of them easily quantifiable, others not. This paper proposes an
overarching, client-centric risk measurement and management framework than can
be used by asset consultants and financial advisers to identify and manage the
various sources of risk faced by investors. It proposes that it is often best to
focus on a primary measure of risk to use in a particular application, and that
for many personal investors, that risk should be the uncertainty of real,
long-term returns...
Full paper >
Behavioral finance
by J Ritter | Originally published by
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal
| Sep 2003 |
This article
provides a brief introduction to behavioral finance. Behavioral finance
encompasses research that drops the traditional assumptions of expected utility
maximisation with rational investors in efficient markets. The two building
blocks of behavioral finance are cognitive psychology (how people think) and the
limits to arbitrage (when markets will be inefficient). The growth of behavioral
finance research has been fuelled by the inability of the traditional framework
to explain many empirical patterns, including stock market bubbles in Japan,
Taiwan, and the US...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
The limits of arbitrage
by A Shleifer & R Vishny | Originally published by
The Journal of Finance
| March 1997 |
Textbook
arbitrage in financial markets requires no capital and entails no risk. In
reality, almost all arbitrage requires capital and is typically risky. Moreover,
professional arbitrage is conducted by a relatively small number of highly
specialised investors using other people's capital. Such professional arbitrage
has a number of interesting implications for security pricing, including the
possibility that arbitrage becomes ineffective in extreme circumstances, when
prices diverge far from fundamental values. The model also suggests where
anomalies in financial markets are likely to appear, and why arbitrage fails to
eliminate them...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
Investing in the 1990s: Occam's
Razor Revisited
by J Bogel | Originally
published in
The Journal of Portfolio Management
| Fall 1991 |
My article
in the Spring 1991
Journal of Portfolio Management
evaluates the
contributions made to the historical ten-year rates of total return achieved by
common stocks in terms of three major components: 1) dividend yield at the
beginning of each period; 2) earnings growth rate for each period; and 3) impact
on return of the change in the price/earnings multiple during each period (Bogle
[1991])...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
Earnings growth: The two percent
dilution
by W Bernstein & R Arnott | Originally published by AIMR
| Sep/Oct 2003 |
My article
in the Spring 1991
Journal of Portfolio Management
evaluates the
contributions made to the historical ten-year rates of total return achieved by
common stocks in terms of three major components: 1) dividend yield at the
beginning of each period; 2) earnings growth rate for each period; and 3) impact
on return of the change in the price/earnings multiple during each period (Bogle
[1991])...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
The equity premium
by E Fama & K French | Originally published by
University of Chicago | April 2001 |
Our
estimates for 1951-2000, 2.55% and 4.32%, are much lower than the equity premium
produced by the average stock return, 7.43%. Our evidence suggests that the high
average return for 1951-2000 is due to a decline in discount rates that produces
large unexpected capital gains. Our main conclusion is that the stock return of
the last half-century is a lot higher than expected...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
Hedge funds: A walk through the
graveyard
by Ross Barry | Originally published by
Macquarie University | March 2003 |
Prior
research has identified a number of biases in hedge fund databases, notably due
to survivorship and selective backfilling of returns. This study finds that
survivorship bias in hedge funds has risen in recent years to almost 4% pa, due
mainly to higher attrition among managed futures, fixed income arbitrage and
some equity hedge (technology) funds, although prior estimates of ‘instant
history’ bias however, are greatly exaggerated...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
Private equity performance
by S Kaplan & A Schoar |
Originally published by MIT School of Mgmt
| April 2001 |
This paper
investigates the performance of private equity partnerships using a data set of
individual fund returns collected by Venture Economics. Over the sample period,
average fund returns net of fees approximately equal the S&P 500 although there
is a large degree of heterogeneity among fund returns. Returns persist strongly
across funds raised by individual private equity partnerships. The returns also
improve with partnership experience. Better performing funds are more likely to
raise follow-on funds and raise larger funds than funds that perform poorly.
This relationship is concave so that top performing funds do not grow
proportionally as much as the average fund in the market. At the industry level,
we show that market entry in the private equity industry is cyclical. Funds (and
partnerships) started in boom times are less likely to raise follow-on funds,
suggesting that these funds subsequently perform worse. Aggregate industry
returns are lower following a boom, but most of this effect is driven by the
poor performance of new entrants, while the returns of established funds are
much less affected by these industry cycles. Several of these results differ
markedly from those for mutual funds...
Full paper >
Back to Quicklinks >
|